ennierda: (Default)
ennierda ([personal profile] ennierda) wrote2007-02-12 05:44 pm
Entry tags:

Stolen from slacktivist

An article on the scary far right Christian people:

http://www.alternet.org/story/46908/

I do often wonder if all of this exporting of well-paying jobs will inevitable cause our economy to collapse.

Re: just my .02

[identity profile] ennierda.livejournal.com 2007-02-12 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Every group needs leaders.

Oddly, the Catholic version of fundamentalism is designed to appeal to very intelligent people and turn them into very dogma-spouting robots. Perhaps its laziness.

Re: just my .02

[identity profile] labrynthos.livejournal.com 2007-02-12 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I hear that.

I'm not convinced that they will ever be more than a minor cultural threat however. They can't do what they really want (kill ALL who disagree) b/c of the law. And if they were to ever attempt to rise up (or use politics to oppress the "non-believers) there would be mass uprising. America isn't all white anymore and it isn't all Fundie either. There's too many Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, gays, lesbians, freaks, and People Who Aren't Crazyâ„¢ to stand against a war with the Fundies.

Re: just my .02

[identity profile] ennierda.livejournal.com 2007-02-12 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)
True, right now they are a minor threat, and possibly they could in-breed themselves into oblivion in a few generations or all die of AIDS because of denial over STDs happening because Real Christians don't have sex. But I think the author has a point towards the end there - radical groups come into power in times of catastrophe. When people are scared, the Patriot Act gets passed quickly and with little opposition. I can see this being a possibility given the right circumstances, even if its unlikely that those circumstances will come about.

Far more likely than a catastophe and radical revolution, though, is a subtle (or not so subtle) pressure on legislature to blur the line between church and state, and if another so-called born again gets elected president, he'll be able to appoint even more justices that are willing to go along with such things.

God forbid, of course. I'd rather we lost Congress in favor of the White House to prevent such a thing. (I'm wary of any party controlling that much of the government.)